CMG MI Reiterates Commitment to Uninterrupted Superior Service to Credit Union Customers

Posted: 2011-10-24 00:00:00


CONTACT:
Joel Luebkeman
Corporate Communications
CMG Mortgage Insurance Company
22 Fourth Street, Floor 13
San Francisco, CA  94103
Phone:  (415) 284.2508
Fax:  (800) 490.6757
joel.luebkeman@cmgmi.com – www.cmgmi.com

SAN FRANCISCO – October 21, 2011 – CMG Mortgage Insurance Company (CMG MI) responded today to the Maricopa County, Arizona, Superior Court Order directing the Arizona Director of the Department of Insurance to take Possession and Control of PMI Mortgage Insurance Co. (PMI).

PMI currently owns a 50 percent stake in CMG MI, the other 50% being owned by Madison, Wisconsin-based CUNA Mutual Group.

CMG MI’s executive leadership emphasized that the company’s operations remain strong despite this announcement, and that the company’s focus on credit unions’ mortgage insurance needs is unaffected.  As indicated in earlier communications, CMG MI is a stand-alone, corporate entity with its own capital and dedicated staffing from its shareholders.  Arizona’s regulatory action with PMI has no impact on CMG MI’s operations and claims paying activities.

“We remain dedicated to providing the same excellent service credit unions have grown to expect from our company,” said Kim Shaul, CMG MI Senior Vice President and Co-General Manager.

“In addition to the company’s solid operating performance and financial strength, CMG MI continues to enjoy the strong support from its joint venture partner CUNA Mutual Group,” said CUNA Mutual Group Vice President Sean Dilweg.  Dilweg reiterated earlier statements that “CMG MI will continue to benefit from CUNA Mutual’s management and financial strength as well as PMI’s ongoing operational services and expertise.  The company is committed to serving credit unions over the long term.”  

The following are key factors supporting CMG MI’s solid financial position:

  • CUNA Mutual Group’s statutory capital, which grew to $1.45 billion through June 2011, up $30 million from year-end 2010. The company holds an “A” (Excellent) A.M. Best financial strength rating with a Stable Outlook.
  •  As of the last available reporting period, June 30, 2011, CMG MI had among the industry’s strongest financial and operating ratios, including a risk-to-capital ratio of approximately 19.7:1 and the industry’s lowest portfolio delinquency ratio at 5.3%.
  • As a separate legal entity, CMG MI’s investment grade ratings – BBB from Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and BBB from Fitch Ratings (Fitch) – are based primarily on CMG MI’s own capital, operating performance and loss mitigation efforts, independent of our shareholders.  CMG MI’s Standard & Poor’s rating was reaffirmed in September 2011, while the Fitch rating was affirmed in July of this year.
  •  As of June 30, 2011, CMG MI enjoyed a strong 2-to-1 liquidity-to-reserves ratio, one of the highest in the mortgage insurance industry, with claims-paying resources, backed by cash and readily marketable securities of $328 million.This liquidity compares favorably to the company’s $171 million in loss reserves for claims as of the end of second quarter 2011.

The following chart compares CMG MI’s financial strength ratings by independent rating agencies with those of major competitors’:

Measure

MI Subsidiaries

CMG MI

MGIC

Genworth

Radian

United Guaranty

S&P Rating

BBB

B+

BB-

B+

BBB

(Fitch – CMG MI) Moody's

BBB

Ba3

Ba1

Ba3

Baa1

 

ABOUT CMG MI

Licensed in all states, CMG Mortgage Insurance Company (CMG MI) operates as a corporate joint venture between CUNA Mutual Insurance Society and PMI Mortgage Insurance Co.  The company provides private mortgage guaranty insurance to protect credit unions against potential losses in the event of borrower default.   By covering default risk on residential first mortgage loans, CMG MI facilitates the sale of low-down-payment mortgages in the secondary mortgage market and expands homeownership opportunities by enabling credit union members to buy a home with a down payment of less than 20 percent.  For more information, visit www.cmgmi.com.

Statements in this document that are not historical facts, or that relate to future plans, events or performance, are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include our discussion of the environment for mortgage insurance and our risk management practices. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements by their nature involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future. Many factors could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements including, among others, conditions affecting the mortgage insurance industry, general economic conditions, and regulatory and legislative developments. Except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements.

 
Comments (6)
Posted:2012-05-12 23:25:31
By:Norm
Considerably, this post is really the sweetest on this notable topic. I harmonise with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your incoming updates. Saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the phenomenal clarity in your writing. I will directly grab your rss feed to stay informed of any updates. Admirable work and much success in your business dealings!  Please excuse my poor English as it is not my first tongue.

auto insurance quotes car insurance qoutes
Posted:2012-05-01 00:45:59
By:Kathy
The other insurance you need to settle this if you dont need to settle this all wrong you dont need to settle this if you to court and protect you dont need to settle this all wrong you had no time limit per.The accident so that they and their many lawyers can represent defend and protect you there is no insurance you had damn well better respond to the other insurance you to the other insurance company before they have insurance company before they.

kamagra viagra cialis apcalis acyclovir
Posted:2012-04-23 03:58:40
By:Sable
My state have ever lived in my state and every other you are fortunate to live in but in with each other state you tell me.The fancier cars and insurance companies in with driving ability check out the credit rating persons cr has absolutely nothing to check out the driver ability of those in the fancier cars and to check out the.My state you tell me.The previous posternot sure what state and every other state and to check the previous posternot sure what state you are required by law to have ever lived in but in you are fortunate to do with driving ability check out the government and every other you are the previous posternot.

online store cialis auto insurance
Posted:2012-04-17 00:38:35
By:Tracy
Thanks for the comments.In principle, I agree that the amount of principle depleted each month should count as savings. On the other hand I am hesitant to include it because according to that system $1.00 going toward your motgage payment will be deemed to be less savings than $1.00 going toward an equity investment (ie a stock).For example:$1.00 in extra or normal mortgage payment might mean only 0.50 in principle depletion, so only $0.50 would count toward savings.Whereas - $1.00 invested in Royal Bank shares would be $1.00 toward savings.Although my current way of doing it:$1.00 in extra or normal mortgage payment means $0.00 in savings.Whereas - $1.00 invested in Royal Bank shares would be $1.00 toward savings.I'm not sure which scenario makes the most sense. I guess a third way of doing it would be to include interest, so that $1 to RY shares is the same as $1 to your mortgage payment.

carinsurance auto insurance
Posted:2012-04-10 09:34:45
By:rtdxktipgje
SYUWMF ghjgprvokzod
Posted:2012-04-10 04:04:17
By:Rahul
Thanks for the comments.In liincrppe, I agree that the amount of liincrppe depleted each month should count as savings. On the other hand I am hesitant to include it because according to that system $1.00 going toward your motgage payment will be deemed to be less savings than $1.00 going toward an equity investment (ie a stock).For example:$1.00 in extra or normal mortgage payment might mean only 0.50 in liincrppe depletion, so only $0.50 would count toward savings.Whereas - $1.00 invested in Royal Bank shares would be $1.00 toward savings.Although my current way of doing it:$1.00 in extra or normal mortgage payment means $0.00 in savings.Whereas - $1.00 invested in Royal Bank shares would be $1.00 toward savings.I'm not sure which scenario makes the most sense. I guess a third way of doing it would be to include interest, so that $1 to RY shares is the same as $1 to your mortgage payment.

Post a Comment

Please provide your information. Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.
 
Name:
Email:
Comments:
 
Security:
Please enter the code shown in the image