Yesterday, the Unites States Supreme Court granted the emergency relief requested in National Federation of Independent Business v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). That is a case challenging OSHA’s emergency temporary standard (ETS) that would require employers with 100 or more employees to demonstrate that covered employees received a COVID-19 vaccine or be subject to weekly testing beginning in February. Here is an earlier NAFCU Compliance blog post on the ETS. And here is the most recent NAFCU news coverage of the ETS.
The case ultimately reached the Court after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dissolved a stay of the ETS while the case and others consolidated with it were up on appeal before the Sixth Circuit.
After the Sixth Circuit dissolved the stays of the ETS, the parties fighting the ETS in the Sixth Circuit applied to the Supreme Court for stays of the ETS pending the resolution of the appeals before the Sixth Circuit. A per curiam opinion granted the applications for stays of the ETS presented to the Court. The per curiam opinion concluded that the stays were appropriate because the applicants for the stays were “likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that [OSHA] lacked authority to impose the mandate.” The per curiam opinion also suggested that the equities do not justify withholding the relief requested by the applicants.
continue reading »