Disclosures are key in overdraft protection litigation

Good morning folks. With everyone seemingly so happy that Tiger Woods won his first tournament in five years yesterday, I could ponder what it is about this country that makes us love seeing people strive to succeed; take perverse pleasure in seeing people fall once they succeed; and ultimately take pride in watching them succeed yet again. But, alas, this is not why you read my blog.
Instead, you read my blog to help get a heads up on some of the issues that are either confronting your credit union or might be in the near future. Overdraft opt-in litigation certainly falls into this category, but I am not sure exactly why. Here’s why I am confused:
First, no one disputes that members have to affirmatively opt in to receive overdraft protections on their debit card transactions. Second, no one disputes that for purposes of calculating a person’s balance there are two common approaches a financial institution can use. First, they can calculate based on all the funds in a person’s account when a debit transaction is made. This is called a ledger balance. Or, they can calculate using an available funds method, which subtracts from a member’s account funds, which include payments that have not yet been drawn but are committed, such as account holds placed by hotels for incidental uses.
continue reading »
Discussion